The South African Government continues to assert that nuclear energy is safe, clean and a solution to climate change. But, it is not. There is no way to deal with high-level nuclear waste that nuclear power plants produce. It can only be stored and will continue to exist for thousands of years. Future generations will be left to deal with the costs of the high level waste and the environmental risks that emanate from it.

 

Koeberg produces about 30 tons of high-level waste per year, and all of it is currently stored at Koeberg – over 1000 tons of waste. If not stored properly, the waste can melt, and also ‘go critical’, which would result in a nuclear explosion. Koeberg Nuclear Power Plant is located just 40km from Cape Town. Let’s keep South Africa safe from nuclear disaster.

 

Koeberg is the only commercial nuclear plant in operation in South Africa and in Africa. But, if we act now and let government know that we do not want nuclear energy in our energy future, we can change that. Safcei is running a Just Clean Energy campaign. We need your help. Let government know that you say no to nuclear energy and yes to just clean energy!

#NuclearFreeSA #JustCleanEnergy #JustTransition

Latest News

As COP26 kicks off, NGOs highlight concerns over South African government’s nuclear power aspirations

At a critical time for decisions about the intensifying climate crises – with global climate action talks (COP26) happening in Glasgow Scotland – the Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute (SAFCEI) and Earthlife Africa Johannesburg say the South African government continues to promote nuclear energy as a viable solution to climate change. In recent weeks there has been a […]

Major Concerns over DMRE’s Obsession with Nuclear Energy, While Avoiding Renewables

MEDIA RELEASE 31 AUGUST 2021 Major Concerns over DMRE’s Obsession with Nuclear Energy, While Avoiding Renewables The Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute (SAFCEI) and Earthlife Africa Johannesburg – the two civil society organisations who took the South African government to court over its illegal and unconstitutional R1-trillion nuclear deal with Russia in 2017 – […]

SAFCEI & ELA-JHB Representations on Eskom Thyspunt NISL application

SAFCEI and ELA-JHB submit that it would be irregular for the NNR to grant a NISL in circumstances where Eskom’s CEO has indicated that it is unable to build new nuclear power (due to its precarious financial position), where the IRP2019 indicates that preparations for a new nuclear build programme should commence with the development […]

Take Action

3_10

Make a submission

Make a difference and stop nuclear energy in South Africa by making your own submission against nuclear developments.

3_12

Join our digital protest

Upload a photo of yourself holding a sign with a message on it and include the hashtags #NuclearFreeSA #JustCleanEnergy #JustTransition. We will add it to our protest gallery. You can also post these photos on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook using the same hashtags.

Write an opinion piece

Engage with what is being reported on nuclear by writing a letter to your local newspaper (or even the national newspapers), or share your concerns on any other medium and send through to info@safcei.org.za so that we can also share it.

Nuclear Energy Timeline

You can navigate the timeline using the arrows

Preloader
  • 1993

    South Africa starts developing the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) together with international partners.

  • 2006

    SA government announced that it was considering building an additional conventional nuclear plant, possibly at Koeberg.

  • 2007

    Eskom board approves a plan in early 2007 to double the country’s generation capacity to 80GWe by 2025

  • 2007-2008

    In late 2007 to early 2008, Eskom was hit by supply constraints, which resulted in loadshedding and subsequently sparked a nationwide drive to decrease electricity demand.

  • 2008

    Procurement process of Nuclear-1, a turn-key project, kicked off and Areva’s EPR and Westinghouse AP1000 were short-listed.

  • Late 2008

    Eskom announced that it would not proceed with either of the bids from Areva and Westinghouse, due to the lack of finance.

  • 2010

    Despite the cancelation of the Nuclear-1 bidding process, the EIA process continued and a draft environmental impact report (EIR) was published in March 2010, recommending the Thyspunt site in the Eastern Cape province near Oyster Bay, Jeffrey’s Bay and Cape St Francis.  

  • 2010

    In October of that year, the Department of Energy released its draft Integrated Electricity Resource Plan (IRP) for 2010-2030, outlining the country’s electricity demand; how this demand might be supplied; and what it is likely to cost. Its balanced scenario represents the best trade-off between least-investment cost, climate change mitigation,..Read More

  • 2014

    Russia signs nuclear procurement agreement with South Africa

  • 2015

    SAFCEI and Earthlife Africa JHB take SA government to court

  • 26 April 2017

    SAFCEI and Earthlife Africa JHB successfully block the Nuclear deal

  • 2018

    Green light for new nuclear plant near Koeberg

  • 2018

    Earthlife Africa JHB, Greenpeace Africa and SAFCEI jointly file an appeal of the environmental impact assessment for the proposed Duynefontein nuclear plant Draft Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Nuclear

  • 2020

    SA’s Department of Mineral Resources and Energy announced it will be working on a roadmap to get 2500 MWe (megawatts) of new nuclear 2020 – Greenpeace Africa and Earthlife Africa (JHB) jointly file an appeal of the environmental impact assessment for the proposed Duynefontein nuclear plant.

Start typing and press Enter to search